(By
Andrew Romano and Jon Ward, Yahoo News, 12 November 2020)
The United States has been conducting presidential elections
for 232 years. No modern candidate has ever refused to accept the results and recognize the
winner’s legitimacy. In this sense,
2020 could be different from any contest since the Civil War — if President
Trump continues to claim that President-elect Joe Biden “stole” the election
from him.
But every indication is that the 2020 election, conducted in
the midst of a pandemic, with by far the most votes ever cast, was run honestly
and the results tabulated accurately — a tribute to the professionalism and
integrity of officials across the country.
Before Election Day, the Trump administration invited a
delegation of 28 international experts from the Organization of American
States, which has reported on elections around the world, to observe the vote.
Its preliminary report found
zero evidence of significant fraud.
The New York Times recently spoke to top election officials in 49 of 50 states. Not one,
Democrat or Republican, reported “that fraud or other irregularities played a
role in the outcome of the presidential race.”
On Nov. 12, the coordinating council overseeing the voting
systems used around the country said in an unprecedented statement distributed by
Trump’s own Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) that “the
November 3rd election was the most secure in American history” and that “there
is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or
was in any way compromised.” “While we
know there are many unfounded claims and opportunities for misinformation about
the process of our elections,” the statement continued, “we can assure you we
have the utmost confidence in the security and integrity of our elections, and
you should too.”
And the head of CISA has spent the last week
explaining on
Twitter and on the agency’s “Rumor Control”
website why none of the stories of so-called fraud that Americans may be
encountering on social media or alternative news sites represent anything out
of the ordinary.
Yet these ominous-but-ultimately-overblown stories continue
to circulate online — stories of pollsters falsifying their surveys to hurt
Trump, of dead people voting, of observers being blocked from watching the
count, of mysterious batches of Biden votes suddenly materializing in
Democratic cities, of computer glitches changing the results, and so on.As a
result, millions of people continue to worry that maybe something happened in
2020 that’s never happened before. They wonder if maybe the election was stolen.
It wasn’t.
What follow are the facts, and just the facts, on each of
the major “fraud” rumors flooding your inbox and your newsfeed.
Even if all of these rumors were true, which they aren’t,
they wouldn’t add up to enough votes to overturn the outcome: Biden is on track
to beat Trump by 5 million votes nationwide and by tens (or even hundreds) of
thousands of votes in key states. And
while some allegations could end up exposing real fraud — because real fraud
happens in every election — history shows that such incidents will be few, far
between and ultimately inconsequential.
In 2014, Loyola Law School professor and voting expert
Justin Levitt investigated every general, primary, special and municipal
election held since the year 2000. Of more than 1 billion ballots cast, he
found just 31 credible instances of potential voter
impersonation, which is one of a few ways that cheating can actually occur.
RUMOR: Democrats and Dominion Voting Systems tampered
with computers to change the results
REALITY: Officials quickly fixed isolated glitches and
accidents, only two of which involved Dominion and none of which affected the
final vote count
No election goes off without a hitch, and in the internet
era, technology can compound some of the usual mistakes. But there’s a big
difference between Democrats conspiring with Dominion Voting Systems to “hack”
election and delete Republican votes and the kind of minor, easily detectable
and correctible data-entry accidents and software glitches that complicate any
computer-based enterprise.
The first is what Trump & Co. darkly speculate, without
evidence, to have taken place in close-run states. The second is what actually happened.
Consider the example of Antrim County, Mich., a Republican
stronghold where unofficial results initially showed Biden beating Trump by
roughly 3,000 votes — a sharp reversal from Trump's performance there in 2016.
Trump supporters flagged the discrepancy. Tweets about it went viral. Soon
conservatives such as Ted Cruz were calling for investigations and alleging
that maybe the same election-management software used in Antrim County (Dominion
Voting Systems) had screwed up the statewide count.
Experts eventually figured out what went wrong: An election
worker had “configured ballot scanners and reporting systems with slightly
different versions of the ballot, which meant some results did not line up with
the right candidate when officials loaded them into the system,” according to the New York Times. By then local officials
had already caught and corrected the error — even before another round of
review conducted by Republican and Democratic “canvassers” that is designed to
catch such mistakes. In the revised count, Trump beat Biden by roughly 2,500
votes.
But these facts haven’t deterred Trump allies from seizing
on other, unrelated examples of routine tech-related errors to falsely
insinuate some sort of nefarious conspiracy involving Dominion. In Oakland
County, Mich., election workers mistakenly counted votes from the city of
Rochester Hills twice, according to the Michigan Department of State — then
spotted and fixed their error. An incumbent Republican county commissioner kept
his seat as a result.
“As a Republican, I am disturbed that this is intentionally
being mischaracterized to undermine the election process,” Tina Barton, the
clerk in Rochester Hills, said in a video she posted online. “This was an
isolated mistake that was quickly rectified.”
Oakland County used software from a company called Hart
InterCivic, not Dominion.
Meanwhile in Georgia, glitchy software updates affected how
poll workers checked in voters in Spalding and Morgan counties, which
both halted voting for a few hours. In another Georgia county,
Gwinnett, a different glitch delayed the reporting of results. Gwinnett County used Dominion; the other counties did not.
In any case, the issues did not affect the counts. Trump won Spalding
County by 21 points and Morgan County by 42; Biden won Gwinnett by 18.
Elsewhere, fringier far-right activists have vaguely theorized that secret CIA computer systems called
“Hammer” and “Scorecard” hacked the election on Biden’s behalf, pointing to
momentary inconsistencies in CNN’s unofficial, on-air vote tallies for the 2019
Kentucky gubernatorial race as evidence. There is no proof that Hammer and
Scorecard exist, and even if they did, experts say they would not be able to
intercept the digital transmission of vote results and change them without
being detected; officials always compare the transmitted results to paper
receipts from the original machines before certifying the outcome. “The Hammer and Scorecard nonsense [is] just that —
nonsense,” tweeted
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency director Chris Krebs.
“This is not a real thing, don’t fall for it and think 2x before you share.”
Yet Twitter and Facebook posts from Trump and White House
press secretary Kayleigh McEnany falsely implied that the isolated issues in
Michigan and Georgia were signs of widespread problems with the election. On
Thursday, the president even went so far as to tweet that Dominion itself had
deleted millions of his votes — a claim with no basis in reality. He followed
up Sunday and Monday by echoing baseless conspiracy theories alleging Democratic
control of Dominion, which have been debunked as well. The president has not provided a shred of
proof that software switched or deleted a single one of his votes — let alone
the tens or even hundreds of thousands he would need to overturn his losses in
Michigan, Georgia and elsewhere.
Not to be deterred, however, Georgia’s two Republican
senators, who are jockeying for advantage in their Jan. 5 runoff elections,
called on Brad Raffensperger, the state’s Republican secretary of state, to
resign because he had “failed the people of Georgia.”
“That is not going to happen,” Raffensperger said in a
statement. “My job is to follow Georgia law and see to it that all legal votes,
and no illegal votes, are counted properly and accurately. … As a Republican, I
am concerned about Republicans keeping the U.S. Senate. I recommend that
Senators Loeffler and Perdue start focusing on that.”
RUMOR: Biden won only because of ‘illegal’ votes
REALITY: Actual illegal votes are rare, and the courts
are considering all credible charges
In every election, some people cast ballots that end up not
counting because they run afoul of state election law for one reason or
another. It’s critical to the integrity of the election — and public trust in
America’s democratic process — that officials identify and disqualify such
votes. Every state has numerous safeguards in place to ensure that’s exactly
what happens.
But the mere existence of irregularities doesn’t invalidate
an election. If it did, no election would be valid. Scale is important here,
too. Illegal votes can affect the outcome only if enough of them benefit the
winner to potentially account for his or her entire margin of victory. “One would have to show, at minimum, more illegal votes than
the margin between the candidates,” Richard
Hasen, a law and political science professor at the University of
California, Irvine, and a nationally recognized election law expert, recently
explained. “That would be quite an extreme scale of fraud. Let’s see what the
evidence is.”
The evidence of illegal votes in the 2020 election has been
exceedingly thin.
One of the most detailed complaints about the possibility
that ineligible voters cast ballots, or that votes were manufactured, came in a
lawsuit filed in Michigan on Nov. 9. A pro-Trump lawsuit against the city of Detroit, filed by
the Great Lakes Justice Center, claimed that election workers
were told not to check signatures on mail ballots, that extra mail ballots were
brought in and all counted for Biden, that election workers backdated mail
ballots so they could be counted, and that they “used false information to
process ballots.”
The lawsuit also claimed election observers were blocked
from watching vote counting at key moments, that votes from ineligible voters
were counted and that a handful of city workers “coached” voters to cast
ballots for Biden. But the city filed a
detailed response, knocking down the allegations and saying they reflected “an
extraordinary failure to understand how elections function.”
Election workers at the TCF Center, a Detroit convention
center where much of the county’s vote tabulation took place, were instructed
not to check mail-ballot signatures during the count, the city said, because
signature matching had already been done before the ballots arrived at the
facility.
Complaints made in the Great Lakes lawsuit about mail
ballots — known in Michigan as absent voter ballots — being backdated, with the
implication that they had arrived after Election Day, were also plainly false,
the city said. “No ballots received by the Detroit City Clerk after 8:00 p.m.
on November 3, 2020 were even brought to the TCF Center,” the city’s attorneys
wrote. “No ballot could have been ‘backdated,’ because no ballot received after
8:00 p.m. on November 3, 2020 was ever at the TCF Center.”
As for the notion that ineligible votes were counted, or
that votes were concocted out of thin air and assigned to names of people who
didn’t vote, the city said that what Republican observers inside TCF really saw
was election workers correcting an error by some election workers at satellite
locations, who failed to complete a process that allowed some mail ballots to
be counted. It was necessary to enter the date for these ballots to allow them
to count, the city said. “Every single ballot delivered to the TCF Center had already
been verified as having been completed by an eligible voter,” the city said.
The charge of extra ballots being brought in was related to
the arrival of blank ballots that were sent to TCF for use by election workers.
These ballots were given to election workers so they could function as
duplicate ballots in case legitimate ballots were damaged and could not be read
by voting machines, the filing said. “Michigan election law does not call for partisan
challengers to be present when a ballot is duplicated; instead, when a ballot
is duplicated as a result of a ‘false read,’ the duplication is overseen by one
Republican and one Democratic inspector coordinating together,” Detroit’s
lawyers wrote. “That process was followed, and Plaintiffs do not — and cannot —
present any evidence to the contrary.”
The Trump campaign, in a lawsuit of its own filed Tuesday in the U.S.
District Court for the Western District of Michigan, claimed there were cases
in which “ballot duplication was performed only by Democratic election workers,
not bipartisan teams.” This claim has already been dismissed in one lawsuit filed last week
by the Trump campaign in Michigan’s Court of Claims.
The accusation of “false information” was based on records
that list some voters as having been born in the year 1900. The city said some
mail ballots that arrived between Sunday night and Tuesday — all before the
close of polls on Tuesday night — needed to have the birth date manually entered
due to a software “quirk.”
Election workers entering the birth date for those ballots
used Jan. 1, 1900, as a “placeholder date” until the ballot entry could be
matched to the voter’s entry in the state voter file. “That birthday will
appear in several places in the electronic poll book record for a limited
period,” the city said. That leaves the allegation of city workers “coaching” voters
to cast ballots for Biden, a claim made by a city worker named Jessy Jacob in
the lawsuit.
The city said that if this were true it would be “contrary
to the instructions given to workers at the satellite locations,” but also said
it was “curious that Ms. Jacob waited until after the election to raise these
allegations.” The city noted that Jacob had been furloughed prior to the
election, was brought back to work during election season in September and was
furloughed again immediately after the election. The filing also pointed to evidence on social media that two
of the individuals who signed affidavits in the Great Lakes lawsuit were
adherents of the pro-Trump QAnon conspiracy theory.
The Detroit lawyers also pointed out that Trump received
almost three times as many votes in Detroit in the 2020 election as he did four
years ago: 12,654, up from 4,972 in 2016. (The vote for Biden in Detroit this
year was just under 234,000, which was about 1,000 votes less than Hillary
Clinton’s total in 2016. But Biden won the state by almost 150,000 votes.)
“Nothing about those numbers supports the theory of fraud
being advanced. Nothing about those numbers supports the completely
unsubstantiated claims of tens of thousands of improperly processed ballots,”
the city said.
RUMOR: ‘Dead people’ voted for Biden
REALITY: The Trump campaign hasn’t been able to produce
more than one or two potential examples of ‘dead people’ casting ballots (and
no one knows who they voted for)
It’s a perennial claim in American politics: The only
reason my candidate lost is because a bunch of dead people voted for your
candidate. And Trump ally Lindsey Graham, the recently reelected
Republican senator from South Carolina, is its latest proponent.
“The Trump team has canvassed all early voters and absentee
mail-in ballots in Pennsylvania, and they have found over 100 people they think
were dead [and] 15 people that we verified that have been dead who voted,”
Graham said during a Fox News interview. “Six people registered
after they died and voted. In Pennsylvania, I guess you’re never out of it.”
Graham isn’t alone in accusing the deceased of meddling in
the election; members of Trump's family and supporters like former House
Speaker Newt Gingrich and former acting Director of National Intelligence
Richard Grenell have repeated similar charges. Meanwhile, a series of viral tweets and videos shared by Trump fans have
also accused various Michigan residents — some with birth dates from the turn
of the 20th century — of casting absentee ballots from beyond the grave. The implication is that somehow Democrats filled out and
fraudulently submitted ballots in the names of dead people in order to lift
Biden to victory.
But that just doesn’t compute.
In reality, 13 states actually count absentee ballots
submitted by living voters who then die before Election Day, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.
So some of these so-called illegal votes are, in fact, perfectly legal. Elsewhere, states prohibit counting the votes
of people who are no longer alive. They do this in two ways: by disqualifying
the early votes or mail ballots of residents who wind up dying before Election
Day and/or by promptly flagging voters who have recently died so officials can
cross-reference the voter rolls and discount any ballots cast in their name.
It’s a complicated, fast-moving process, and sometimes the
human beings in charge of it make mistakes. One viral video, for instance,
purports to show that “118-year-old ‘William Bradley’ voted via absentee ballot
in Wayne County, Mich.” But what actually happened, according to Politifact, is that Bradley’s son — also named
William Bradley and residing at the same address, but not born in March 1902
and definitely not deceased — voted with his own ballot, which officials then
incorrectly attributed to his father. “No
ballot was cast for the now deceased Bradley,” Politifact explained. “This was
a clerical error, not voter fraud.”
Another Michigan voter, named Donna Brydges, was also cited
in viral pro-Trump videos because her birth date was listed as 1901 in the state’s
qualified voter database. Turns out that Brydges is 75 and voted legally; her
DOB was merely a placeholder.
“It is important to note that some state registration systems
indicate a missing date of birth by adopting filler dates, such as 01/01/1900,
01/01/1850, or 01/01/1800,” a 2017 report about duplicate voting from the
Government Accountability Institute noted. “The vast majority of votes cast by
individuals appearing to be over 115 years old had these three erroneous
birthdates.”
Likewise, CNN recently checked 50 of the more than 14,000 names on a
list of allegedly dead-but-registered Michigan voters making the rounds on
Twitter and found that only five of them voted in 2020 — and all five are, in
fact, alive. None of the 37 actually
dead people in CNN’s sample cast a ballot.
Whatever the exact figures, we’re talking about a small
handful of ballots here — nowhere near the number Trump would need to catch up
in Michigan, where he trails by about 147,000
votes, or Pennsylvania, where he trails by 45,000. A suit
filed by a conservative foundation in Pennsylvania alleged that the state
included 21,000 dead people on its voter rolls. But “the court found no
deficiency in how Pennsylvania maintains its voter rolls,” according to a
spokeswoman for the state attorney general’s office, and “there is currently no
proof provided that any deceased person has voted in the 2020 election.”
And even then there’s no reason to think the dead favor
Democrats over Republicans. In October, a man in Luzerne County, Pa. — a
registered Republican — was charged with felonies after trying to apply for a mail ballot in his dead mother’s
name. On Nov. 7, meanwhile, Trump campaign adviser Corey Lewandowski provided
what he said was “one concrete example” of dead-voter fraud, pointing to an
obituary for Denise Ondick of West Homestead in Allegheny County, Pa.,
who died on Oct. 22 — one day before election officials received her
application for a mail-in ballot, according to online records from the Pennsylvania Department of
State, and 11 days before the county received and recorded her vote. The
Trump campaign has cited a single, similar incident in Nevada.
In an interview with the Philadelphia Inquirer, Ondick’s daughter said she helped
her mother fill out an application for a mail ballot in early October, before
the elder Ondick died of cancer, but that she could not explain why the ballot
had been sent in after her mother’s death. Ondick’s husband said he couldn’t
recall doing anything with the ballot. Ondick’s
daughter also said her mother had planned to vote for Trump.
Lewandowski said Ondick was “one of many” examples of
dead-voter fraud the Trump campaign would be asking the courts to review. So
far, the campaign has not revealed any additional details or mentioned any
other specific cases.
RUMOR: Democrats blocked Republican observers from
watching the count
REALITY: Republican lawyers for the Trump campaign have
admitted in court that this is false
Republicans have focused these complaints on Detroit and
Philadelphia. “We’re seeing this pattern
in Democratic city after Democratic city, but the worst of the country right
now is Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, were they’re not allowing election observers
in, despite clear state law that requires election observers being there,
despite an order from a state judge saying election observers have to be within
6 feet of the ballot counting,” Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, said on Nov. 5, on Sean
Hannity’s Fox News show. “I am angry and I think the American people are angry
because by throwing the observers out, by clouding the vote counting in a
shroud of darkness, they are setting the stage to potentially steal the
election,” Cruz said. These allegations
were repeated by Sens. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., and Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.
But the Trump campaign’s own lawyers acknowledged in a hearing that there have been
Republican observers in the room at all times since mail ballots began to be
opened and counted at the Pennsylvania Convention Center. “Their counsel admitted at the hearing, after
questions from the court, that they had several representatives in the room,”
said the Philadelphia City Commissioners in a statement.
The commissioners, two Democrats and one Republican who
oversee voting in the city, said there were between 15 and 19 Republican
observers present all day on Nov. 5. Hawley
also said that “some states [were] going to court to try to stop poll watchers,
people just observing the ballot counts.”
“I mean, that is deeply, deeply disturbing,” he said.
That was another false claim. The city of Philadelphia
appealed a ruling that partisan observers should be allowed to
oversee the work of election officials from as close as 6 feet away. There was
never an allegation in the suit that poll watchers were being barred from the
room. The Trump campaign’s lawsuit had alleged that its observers,
who were in the room with unobstructed views, wanted to get closer so they
could challenge individual mail ballots if there was no signature on the outer
envelope, or if the voter had written the wrong date on the envelope.
The city’s appeal argued that state law does not permit those
kinds of challenges, a decision the state legislature made in recognition that
allowing challenges to individual ballots would slow down the processing of a
historic number of mail ballots during the COVID-19 pandemic. Challenging the eligibility of voters to cast mail ballots
had to be done when the ballots were requested, Tammy
Bruce, a former Arizona elections official, told Yahoo News.
Observers in the room are entitled to see that mail ballots
are being examined for signatures and that they were properly placed inside a
privacy envelope, and to monitor for anything else of concern, such as the
destruction or discarding of ballots. Gingrich,
also on Fox, claimed poll watchers had been “physically excluded” from
overseeing vote counting.
He pointed specifically to Detroit, where there were
complaints about election officials covering the windows of a counting room at
the TCF Center. “You have a precinct
where you don’t let anyone in. They’re boarded up,” Gingrich claimed. “I would
take every precinct that blocked poll watchers and not count their votes.” But a Detroit city attorney said the windows
were blocked because ballots were being counted closely enough to them that
members of the public could take photos that might disclose the privacy of
voters’ ballots. There were “hundreds of
challengers from both parties … inside the Central Counting Board all afternoon
and all evening,” said Detroit attorney Lawrence Garcia.
The city of Detroit noted in a court filing that “more than
200 Republican challengers were present at the TCF center, and at no time were
they limited to fewer than one challenger for every Absent Voter Counting
Board. While six feet of separation was necessary for health reasons, the
Department of Elections provided large computer monitors at every counting
board, so that challengers could view all information as it was inputted into
the computer.” “When it became clear
that the number of challengers had reached or exceeded the lawful quota and the
room had become over-crowded, additional challengers were not admitted until
challengers from their respective parties voluntarily departed.”
When Yahoo News asked Gingrich what proof he had of
observers being “physically excluded” from vote-counting centers, a Gingrich
spokesman essentially admitted there was none. “With regard to the people being
kept from watching ballots being counted, we now have a better understanding of
the situations in Philadelphia and Detroit,” said Louie Brogdon, editorial
director of Gingrich 360, a consulting and media production firm. “When Speaker Gingrich made his earlier
comment, he was speaking on the best information he had at the time,” Brogdon
said.
RUMOR: Democrats suddenly ‘found’ new, fraudulent Biden
votes to beat Trump
REALITY: Counting mail ballots took a long time in some
states, like Pennsylvania, because the Republican Party blocked reforms that
would have avoided this problem
In the days after Election Day, Trump said several times
that Democrats were trying to cheat him by “finding” votes for Biden. “They are finding Biden votes all over the
place — in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan. So bad for our Country!”
the president tweeted just before noon on Wednesday, Nov.
4. His mention of those three states is
telling. They are the same ones that Yahoo News was writing about for three
months leading up to the election, raising awareness about what one
Pennsylvania Republican warned
in September was a “man-made disaster … that easily could be avoided.”
The disaster happened. It didn’t have to. And it created
space for the president to falsely claim that votes were being “found” when in
fact they were simply being counted in a delayed fashion. The delay was caused
— seemingly intentionally — by the Republican Party itself.
Here’s what happened. After the outbreak of COVID-19 in the
late winter and early spring, most states allowed all voters to cast ballots by
mail in the spring and early summer, during primary elections. Over the summer,
some states moved back to a focus on in-person voting. But most stuck with
expanded access to voting by mail. For many states this was new. But five states have conducted
their elections by mail for years now: Colorado, Utah, Washington, Oregon and
Hawaii. Two more, Arizona and California, have done their elections mostly by
mail for a few years.
As states moved to voting by mail, most had rules that
allowed election clerks to process those ballots as they arrived. As Ohio
Secretary of State Frank LaRose, a Republican, told
Yahoo News in August, “We can start processing those right away, meaning:
Cut the envelope, open, verify the information on it, put it through the
scanner, but not hit ‘tabulate.’ That can’t happen until 7:30 on election
night.” As a result, Ohio had most of
its mail ballots counted early on election night. Most states did. But Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania —
the same three states mentioned by Trump in his tweet — refused to make a
change allowing clerks to process mail ballots like the rest of the country.
Action was needed from the state legislature, and in all
three states the Republican Party held majorities in both the state Senate and
the state House. LaRose himself warned
of a “really terrible situation” if these legislatures didn’t make a simple
change, giving clerks time to process mail ballots before Election Day.
In other words, the GOP knew its lack of action was going to
delay the counting of mail ballots by several days, and either did nothing or —
as in the case of Michigan — gave clerks one day ahead of Election Day to
process mail ballots, rather than the week or two that experts and election
officials recommended.
In Pennsylvania, Republicans at first allowed clerks to
start processing mail ballots 21 days before Election Day, but then cut that
down to three and included a number of “poison pill” ideas in its bill that
guaranteed Democrats would oppose it.
There has been no evidence of ballots being added. That has
happened before in
Philadelphia, but on a very small scale. In May, an election judge
there pleaded guilty to adding a total of 113 votes over
three elections from 2014 to 2016 to help judicial candidates running for a
local court. The point made by LaRose
and other Republican experts is that even isolated examples of cheating, which
do happen, do not add up to a conspiracy. To manipulate tens of thousands
of votes without detection is not possible given the multiple layers of
security and accountability involved in running elections, experts say. One of those layers is the postelection audit
that each state conducts itself to ensure that the result was accurate.
RUMOR: Pollsters falsified their results to suppress the
GOP vote
REALITY: Republicans turned out in record numbers even
though pollsters mistakenly underestimated Trump again
Last Thursday, Trump told reporters that pollsters had
deliberately produced false surveys showing Biden with a big lead in order to
suppress Trump votes and help Biden win the election. He followed up Monday night with a series of tweets repeating the same claim. “.@FoxNews, @QuinnipiacPoll, ABC/WaPo,
NBC/WSJ were so inaccurate with their polls on me, that it really is tampering
with an Election,” Trump wrote. “They were so far off in their polling, and in
their attempt to suppress - that they should be called out for Election
Interference … ABC/WaPo had me down 17 points in Wisconsin, the day before the
election, and I WON! In Iowa, the polls had us 4 points down, and I won by
8.2%! Fox News and Quinnipiac were wrong on everything… The worst polling ever,
and then they’ll be back in four years to do it again. This is much more then [sic]
voter and campaign finance suppression!”
Trump is right about one thing: Pollsters again
underestimated the president’s support in key (mostly Midwestern)
states such as Iowa and Wisconsin, four years after he first beat his Rust Belt
polling numbers to eke out a narrow Electoral College victory over Hillary
Clinton. Trump is wrong, however, that
this polling miss was part of some sort of plot to propel Biden to the
presidency. There are two reasons for
this. First, these errors are the opposite of deliberate — instead, they’re a
source of embarrassment for pollsters nationwide. And second, even if
they had been deliberate, they didn’t actually “work.” They
didn’t stop Republicans from voting.
Polling is a business, and accuracy is the coin of the
realm. As Fox News contributor Liberty Vittert, a data science
professor at the Washington University in St. Louis, recently explained,
“Pollsters poll on many more issues than political campaigns, and their
businesses depend on their reputations for accurate polling.”
To believe that dozens of pollsters independently falsified
their results to boost Biden, in other words, you’d also have to believe that
somehow they were all independently willing to sabotage their reputations and
hurt their businesses on the slim chance that Trump’s passionate base would see
Biden’s inflated numbers and decide to stay home. “The president’s accusation doesn’t make
sense,” Vittert wrote. “Think about it: why would any business hire a pollster
if it thought the polling was inaccurate?”
Instead, the truth is that pollsters labored mightily to improve their methodologies after
missing a lot of non-college-educated white Trump voters in 2016 — and now, in
2020, they’ve missed again, perhaps because many of those voters simply aren’t
as willing as highly engaged, COVID-era Democrats to pick up the phone and
participate in a practice they’ve already rejected as “fake news.”
This phenomenon is called non-response bias. Pollsters are not proud of their failure
to correct for it. “The reason why the
polls are wrong is because the people who were answering these surveys were the
wrong people,” pollster David Shor recently explained. “The problem [is that]
one group of people [is] really, really excited to share their opinions, while
another group isn’t. As long as that bias exists, it’ll percolate down to
whatever you do.”
The flip side of this phenomenon, as Shor put it, is that
“these low-trust people still vote, even if they’re not answering these phone
surveys.” The 2020 results bear this out. Not only did Trump receive more than 72 million votes — the second-most in U.S.
history, after Biden’s 78 million — but Senate Republicans in Texas, Michigan,
Colorado, North Carolina and Georgia actually beat the president’s share of the
vote in their respective states. Together,
these stats suggest that far from being discouraged by Trump’s unpromising poll
numbers, Republicans turned out in force on Nov. 3. It’s just that more people
voted for Biden.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/the-2020-election-wasnt-stolen-here-are-all-the-facts-that-prove-it-184623754.html
